Court Decision Settles Outstanding Issues in MJ Management’s FavorMarch 23, 2026 By possingeradmin On March 18, 2026, the court entered an order granting MJ Management’s Motion for Summary Judgment in the case of MJ Management v. Kelly, (Whatcom Count Sup. Ct. No. 25-2-02688-37). The decision entered by Judge Jennifer Slattery, both granted MJ Management’s request for a judgment requiring payment of unpaid Joint Maintenance Fees by the Defendant but also resolved a number of legal questions that remained unanswered by the court over the last few years. The decision established MJ Management’s right to collect unpaid Joint...
Tumble Creek Club Faces Potential Consumer Protection Class Action Over Membership AgreementJanuary 2, 2026 By possingeradmin On October 30, 2025, Penny Gutschmidt, a former resident of Tumble Creek, filed suit in Kittitas County Superior Court against Tumble Creek Club, LLC and others alleging among other things that that Tumble Creek’s Membership Agreement violates Washington’s Consumer Protection Act, Ch. 19.86 RCW. In addition to her own personal claims against Tumble Creek Club, Gutschmidt’s Complaint alleges that she is only one of many affected by the Membership Agreement and seeks to certify a class action on behalf of...
Civil RICO and the Growing Use of Treble Damages in Business DisputesOctober 10, 2025 By possingeradmin The ability to recover treble damages is one of the most significant incentives for plaintiffs to file a Civil RICO lawsuit. Under Civil RICO, plaintiffs can recover three times the amount of actual damages if they can prove that their business or property was harmed by a pattern of racketeering activity. This provision has made Civil RICO an attractive option in many business-related disputes, where the prospect of tripled damages can dramatically alter the stakes. This article explores the use...
The Challenges of Proving a “Pattern of Racketeering” in Civil RICO CasesSeptember 26, 2025 By possingeradmin One of the most difficult aspects of pursuing a Civil RICO case is proving that the defendant engaged in a “pattern of racketeering activity.” While Civil RICO provides plaintiffs with the opportunity to seek treble damages and attorney’s fees for harms caused by racketeering, establishing the necessary elements—particularly the pattern requirement—can be a significant hurdle. This article examines the concept of a “pattern” in Civil RICO litigation, the legal standards involved, and the challenges plaintiffs face in meeting this requirement....
The Expanding Scope of Civil RICO Beyond Organized CrimeSeptember 12, 2025 By possingeradmin Originally designed to combat traditional organized crime, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) has evolved significantly since its enactment in 1970. While the statute was intended to target the Mafia and other criminal syndicates, the broad language of Civil RICO has made it applicable to a wide array of legal contexts, including business disputes, corporate fraud, and political corruption. This article will explore how Civil RICO has expanded beyond its initial scope and the implications of this shift...
