The ability to recover treble damages is one of the most significant incentives for plaintiffs to file a Civil RICO lawsuit. Under Civil RICO, plaintiffs can recover three times the amount of actual damages if they can prove that their business or property was harmed by a pattern of racketeering activity. This provision has made Civil RICO an attractive option in many business-related disputes, where the prospect of tripled damages can dramatically alter the stakes. This article explores the use of treble damages in Civil RICO cases and the impact they have on litigation strategy and outcomes.

Treble Damages: An Overview

Treble damages are a form of punitive damages that aim to deter illegal conduct by increasing the financial penalties for defendants found liable under the law. Under 18 U.S.C. § 1964(c), Civil RICO allows plaintiffs to recover three times their actual damages, plus attorney’s fees. The statute does not require any showing of malice or intent to justify treble damages; once a plaintiff proves their case, treble damages are automatic.

In business disputes, the prospect of treble damages can be a powerful tool for plaintiffs, particularly in cases involving financial fraud or corporate misconduct. For instance, if a plaintiff suffers $1 million in damages due to a fraudulent scheme, a successful Civil RICO claim could result in a $3 million recovery, significantly increasing the potential liability for the defendant.

Treble Damages as a Litigation Strategy

The availability of treble damages under Civil RICO can shape litigation strategy in several ways:

• Plaintiff Leverage: The threat of treble damages gives plaintiffs significant leverage in settlement negotiations. Defendants facing the possibility of tripled damages may be more inclined to settle early, rather than risk a large judgment at trial.
• Defense Costs: Defending against a Civil RICO claim can be costly, as the stakes are often much higher than in typical civil cases. The risk of treble damages, combined with the possibility of paying the plaintiff’s attorney’s fees, adds to the financial pressure on defendants.
• Expanding Claims: Some plaintiffs may attempt to use Civil RICO to transform what would otherwise be standard business disputes into high-stakes litigation. By alleging that fraudulent business practices constitute a pattern of racketeering, plaintiffs can potentially unlock treble damages, even in cases where traditional breach of contract or fraud claims would not provide such significant remedies.

Criticism of Treble Damages in Civil RICO

While treble damages are intended to serve as a deterrent against serious criminal conduct, critics argue that their use in civil litigation—especially in business disputes—can lead to abusive lawsuits. Defendants in Civil RICO cases often contend that plaintiffs are using the statute to coerce settlements by threatening the disproportionate financial burden of treble damages.

In cases where the underlying conduct does not involve organized crime or egregious misconduct, the availability of treble damages may be seen as overly punitive. This has led to calls for reform, with some legal commentators suggesting that courts should have greater discretion in awarding treble damages in civil cases, rather than making them automatic upon a finding of liability.

Judicial Reactions and Limitations

Despite the potential for treble damages to increase litigation risks, courts have sometimes pushed back against plaintiffs who attempt to misuse Civil RICO. Judges are often wary of cases where plaintiffs seek to frame routine business disputes as RICO claims solely to access treble damages.

For example, courts may dismiss Civil RICO claims if they find that the plaintiff has failed to establish the required pattern of racketeering or if the connection to criminal activity is too tenuous. Judges also have discretion to limit the scope of damages in certain cases, particularly where the plaintiff’s claims are based on speculative or exaggerated harms.

Conclusion

Treble damages under Civil RICO represent a potent legal remedy that can dramatically increase the financial stakes of business litigation. While these damages serve as a deterrent against serious wrongdoing, their use in civil cases, particularly those involving business disputes, has sparked debate. As plaintiffs continue to seek treble damages in a variety of legal contexts, courts must balance the need for deterrence with the risk of encouraging abusive litigation practices. In the meantime, both plaintiffs and defendants must carefully assess the potential for treble damages when navigating Civil RICO claims.

Next Steps for Businesses

If you have an issue related to civil litigation that may involve Civil RICO or any other issues involving complex legal matters, contact Possinger Law Group.

= = = = =

About Possinger Law Group, PLLC

Founded in 2001, Possinger Law Group is a boutique law firm dedicated to elite levels of service to small and medium-sized businesses and the individuals that own them. When faced with serious problems, clients have reached out to Possinger Law Group to be a trusted advisor and advocate to be a guide through high conflict situations and complex legal challenges. In litigation matters, Possinger Law Group works with its clients to effectively resolve disputes, and when necessary, by being fiercely aggressive in litigation.

Editor’s Note: This blog post, as well as any data and information provided are for informational purposes only. and is not intended to constitute legal advice and may not constitute the most up-to-date legal or other information. Readers of this article should contact their attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular legal matter. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or refrain from acting based on information on this article without first seeking legal advice from counsel in the relevant jurisdiction.